Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2012 (5) TMI 172 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appellant Ordered to Pre-Deposit Excess Exemption Availed The final order required the appellant to make a pre-deposit of the excess exemption availed from 1.4.08 onwards within eight weeks. Compliance was ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Appellant Ordered to Pre-Deposit Excess Exemption Availed

                            The final order required the appellant to make a pre-deposit of the excess exemption availed from 1.4.08 onwards within eight weeks. Compliance was scheduled to be reviewed on 4.12.12.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Availment and utilization of Modvat credit.
                            2. Refund of duty paid through PLA.
                            3. Revenue neutrality.
                            4. Invocation of extended period of limitation.
                            5. Compliance with Notification No. 56/2002-CE dated 14.11.2002.
                            6. Requirement of pre-deposit.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Availment and Utilization of Modvat Credit:
                            The appellant, engaged in manufacturing P & P Medicaments in Jammu, received furnace oil from April 2005 to March 2009 but did not avail credit on the duty paid, amounting to Rs. 45,72,156/-. The credit was later availed on 14.8.09 and utilized for payment of duty on final products. The proceedings initiated against the appellant proposed the denial of this credit as it was availed after three and a half years, which was challenged on the grounds that the Cenvat credit Rules do not limit the time horizon for availment of credit. The Commissioner accepted the appellant's stand, dropping the demand on this point.

                            2. Refund of Duty Paid Through PLA:
                            The appellant paid duty amounting to Rs. 41,71,424/- in cash through PLA, which was subsequently refunded. The proceedings proposed the recovery of this refund, alleging that the appellant should have utilized the credit of Rs. 45,72,156/- during the period April 2005 to March 2009. The Commissioner confirmed the demand for the recovery of the refund by invoking the longer period of limitation and imposed a penalty of an identical amount.

                            3. Revenue Neutrality:
                            The appellant contended that the entire exercise was revenue neutral as the duty paid from PLA during the period April 2005 to March 2009 would have been less if the credit was availed and utilized during the material period. The Tribunal referenced the decision in CCE, Jammu vs. New India Wire & Cables-2008 (232) ELT 681 (Tri.-Del.), which observed that such situations are revenue neutral. However, the Technical Member disagreed, stating that the notification explicitly required the utilization of Cenvat credit first, and any deviation from this would not be considered revenue neutral.

                            4. Invocation of Extended Period of Limitation:
                            The show cause notice was issued on 28.10.10, alleging that the appellant availed the credit after three and a half years. The appellant argued that the demand was time-barred as they had informed the Superintendent of Central Excise about the credit availed in August 2009. The Tribunal found that the notice was prima facie barred by limitation.

                            5. Compliance with Notification No. 56/2002-CE dated 14.11.2002:
                            The notification provided exemption for goods manufactured in Jammu, subject to the condition that the manufacturer first utilizes the whole of the Cenvat credit available before paying the balance amount in cash. The Technical Member emphasized that the appellant's practice of not availing the credit during the material period and later utilizing it was contrary to the notification's provisions. The notification aimed to exempt duty only to the extent of value addition, and the appellant's actions negated the express provisions of the notification.

                            6. Requirement of Pre-deposit:
                            The Judicial Member opined that the appellant had made a good case for the stay petition, considering the situation as revenue neutral. However, the Technical Member disagreed, stating that the appellant violated the express provisions of the notification, and thus, pre-deposit should be called for. The final order, based on the majority view, required the appellant to make a pre-deposit of the excess exemption availed from 1.4.08 onwards within eight weeks.

                            Final Order:
                            In view of the majority order, the pre-deposit of excess exemption availed from 1.4.08 onwards (to be quantified by the applicant) is required to be made within a period of 8 weeks from the date of pronouncement of the final order. The matter is to come up for ascertaining compliance on 4.12.12.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found