Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a refund claim under Notification No. 41/2007 could be denied as time-barred when the claim was filed within the prescribed period but supporting certificate from the Port Trust was furnished later due to delay not attributable to the claimant.
Analysis: The refund application was presented within the stipulated time. The only defect was non-filing of the Port Trust certificate at the same time, the certificate having been issued belatedly by the authorities concerned. A claimant cannot be denied the export-linked exemption or refund benefit for a delay in obtaining a supporting document which was beyond its control. In such circumstances, the later production of the document was to be treated as sufficient compliance with the prescribed time requirement.
Conclusion: The time-bar objection was unsustainable and the refund claim was required to be considered on merits.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was sent back to the original authority for reconsideration of the refund claim in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a refund claim is filed within the prescribed period, subsequent furnishing of a supporting document delayed by a third party should not defeat the claim if the delay was beyond the claimant's control.