Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether books seized from an export consignment could be confiscated and penalised under the Customs Act on the footing that their export infringed copyright law and attracted the prohibitions relied upon by the department.
Analysis: The consignment contained books marked for sale only in specified countries, and a portion was intended for export to Nigeria. The confiscation rested on Section 113(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, read with the copyright provisions and the notifications said to arise from Section 11(2)(n) and 11(2)(u) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found that the provisions invoked by the department were directed to import-related prohibitions and to importation of infringing copies under the Copyright Act, 1957. Since the department could not show a prohibition applicable to the export of the goods in question, the basis for confiscation and penalty was held unsustainable.
Conclusion: The confiscation order and the penalties were set aside and the appeals were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A customs confiscation under Section 113(d) cannot be sustained unless the prohibition relied upon is legally applicable to the export in question; import-oriented copyright restrictions and notifications cannot be used to penalise an export absence a valid export prohibition.