Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount claimed towards forest compensation was deductible as an accrued liability for computing taxable income.
Analysis: The compensation liability under rule 17 of the Orissa Forest Contract Rules, 1966 was not fixed merely on the service of interim reports or intimation of infractions. The rule contemplated assessment of compensation by the Divisional Forest Officer, with a right of appeal to the Conservator of Forests. Since the amount had not been quantified within the accounting year and the claim itself was disputed, the liability had not crystallised into a definite and enforceable figure. A liability that is contingent or unascertained cannot be treated as an accrued deduction for income-tax purposes.
Conclusion: The claim was not allowable as an accrued liability and the answer to the referred question was in the negative, in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The assessed compensation could be deducted only when it became quantified and crystallised in accordance with the governing forest rules, not on the basis of provisional intimation alone.
Ratio Decidendi: For deduction in computing income, a liability must be actual and crystallised during the relevant year; a contingent or merely estimated liability, pending statutory quantification, is not deductible.