Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the circumstances of the case, pre-deposit of service tax and penalty should be waived and the matter remanded for decision on merits without insisting upon pre-deposit.
Analysis: The demand was small in amount and the applicant had raised a prima facie contention that three-wheelers were not covered within the relevant definition of light motor vehicle for the purposes of the alleged taxable service. The appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) had not been disposed of on merits, and the insistence on pre-deposit was therefore not warranted at that stage. In these circumstances, a case was made out for interim protection and for sending the matter back for a merits decision.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of service tax and penalty was waived and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits without insisting on pre-deposit, in accordance with law.