Customs valuation challenge turns on notice bounds and contemporaneous comparable imports for interim waiver relief.

In a customs valuation dispute, the interim relief discussion turned on whether the valuation order remained within the show cause notice and whether the enhanced value was supported by reliable contemporaneous comparable import evidence. The notice proposed valuation under Rule 5 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, but the adjudication proceeded under Rule 8, indicating a departure from the stated basis. The material relied on by the department was not shown to be contemporaneous or sufficiently comparable. On that basis, a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was found to exist.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant made out a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a customs valuation dispute.

Analysis: The show cause notice proposed valuation under Rule 5 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, but the adjudicating authority ultimately assessed the goods under Rule 8. The valuation order was found to have travelled beyond the notice and, in any event, did not disclose a clear basis for adopting the enhanced value. The invoices relied upon by the department were also not shown to be contemporaneous imports and did not satisfactorily establish comparability of the goods or the declared values.

Conclusion: The appellant established a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The relief was granted in favour of the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi: An enhancement of customs value cannot be sustained at the interim stage where the adjudication travels beyond the show cause notice and the residual valuation basis is not clearly supported by contemporaneous comparable import evidence.

---