MRP valuation applies to multi-piece retail-sale tobacco packs when outer packs and inner pouches are intended for retail sale.

Multi-piece packages of chewing tobacco were treated as retail-sale packages for MRP-based valuation because the larger packs contained identical individual pouches intended for retail sale, either individually or as a whole. The packaged commodities rules required MRP declaration on such retail packages, and the evidence showed MRP was declared on the outer packs and that the packs were capable of retail sale as packaged. Rule 34's exemption for small packs sold by weight did not apply on the facts. Accordingly, the commodity fell within section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and valuation under the MRP-based scheme was sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the multi-piece packages containing chewing tobacco were packages intended for retail sale so as to require declaration of maximum retail price and attract valuation under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Analysis: The goods were notified for assessment on MRP basis. The controversy turned on whether the larger packs containing individual pouches were multi-piece packages intended for retail sale. The applicable rules required MRP declaration on every package intended for retail sale, and the definition of multi-piece package covered a package containing two or more identical packaged pieces intended for retail sale either individually or as a whole. The evidence showed that MRP was declared on the larger packs, the individual pouches were meant for retail sale, and the larger packs were capable of retail sale as such. The exemption under Rule 34 for small packs sold by weight did not assist the appellant because the packs in question were not within the exempted factual matrix. The relied-upon precedent concerning packages not intended for retail sale did not apply on the facts.

Conclusion: Section 4A applied to the multi-piece packages, and the demand based on MRP valuation was sustainable.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was rejected because the packages were held to be retail-sale multi-piece packages liable to duty under the MRP-based valuation scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a notified commodity is packed as a multi-piece package intended for retail sale and MRP is required to be declared under the packaged commodities rules, valuation must be made under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 rather than section 4.

---