Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest could be levied under section 70 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 after the assessed estate duty had been paid in instalments, and whether the Controller could impose such interest without having specified the rate of interest at the time of granting instalments.
Analysis: Section 70(1) permits postponement of recovery of estate duty where the duty cannot be raised at once without excessive sacrifice, and it contemplates payment of interest and such other terms as the Controller thinks fit. The power to grant instalments is therefore conditional upon fixation of the interest terms at the time of permitting deferment. On the facts, the petitioner was allowed to pay in instalments, but the rate of interest was not specified when that concession was granted. The entire duty was ultimately paid, though in stages, and no valid order for postponed recovery with specified interest had been made. In such circumstances, there was no legal basis for a subsequent levy of interest after the demand stood discharged.
Conclusion: The order levying interest was without jurisdiction and was liable to be quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest under section 70 can be levied only when postponement of recovery is granted on specified terms, including interest fixed at the time of the concession; once the assessed duty has been paid without any valid prior order stipulating such interest, a later levy is impermissible.