Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of the penalty amount and stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeals.
Analysis: The appeal arose from a case of alleged customs duty evasion and contravention of import regulations involving seizure of gold, jewellery and currency. The Tribunal noted that the duty-evasion aspect had already been settled under section 28(1A) of the Customs Act, 1962, and that what remained was the alleged contravention of import regulations. It further observed that the penalties appeared prima facie excessive and that similar relief had already been granted in connected matters. The Tribunal also noted the pre-deposits already made by the appellants.
Conclusion: Waiver of the penalties was granted for admission of the appeals and recovery of the disputed amounts was stayed during the pendency of the appeals, with a restriction against refund of the stated amount until final disposal.