Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate order could be sustained when it relied upon a disputed letter said to have been issued by the consignee's Superintendent without verification of its existence and correctness, and whether the matter required remand for fresh decision.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the letter dated 08.01.02, relied upon by the appellate authority to hold that the goods had been received by the consignee, was in fact available and reliable. Since the Revenue challenged both its production before the original adjudicating authority and the verification of its authenticity, the Tribunal found that the factual basis of the appellate finding required examination by the original authority. In these circumstances, the proper course was to set aside the appellate order and send the matter back for verification of the letter and reconsideration on the basis of the material actually proved on record.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh decision after verifying the existence of the relied-upon letter; the Revenue succeeded in the appeal by way of remand.
Final Conclusion: The controversy was not finally decided on merits and was returned for fresh adjudication, with the Revenue obtaining the remand of the matter.