High Court reverses Tribunal decision on income-tax exemption for SEZ sales.

The High Court reversed the Tribunal's decision, denying income-tax exemption under section 10A of the Income-tax Act for profits from inter-unit sales within SEZs. The court held that exemption is only available for actual exports with consideration received in convertible foreign exchange, as defined by the RBI. The court emphasized that the SEZ Act does not change the requirement for actual exports with convertible foreign exchange, rejecting the liberal interpretation by the Tribunal. The court concluded that extending exemption to inter-unit sales within SEZs would be contrary to the statutory provisions.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to Income-tax exemption under section 10A of the Income-tax Act for profits derived from inter-unit sales within Special Economic Zones (SEZs).
2. Validity of the Tribunal's decision to condone the delay in filing appeals by the assessee.
3. Interpretation of "convertible foreign exchange" and "export turnover" under section 10A(3) of the Income-tax Act.
4. Applicability of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, to claims under section 10A of the Income-tax Act.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Entitlement to Income-tax exemption under section 10A of the Income-tax Act for profits derived from inter-unit sales within Special Economic Zones (SEZs).
The respondent-assessee, an industrial unit in the Cochin SEZ, claimed exemption under section 10A of the Income-tax Act for profits derived from the sale of components to another industrial unit in the Madras SEZ, for which payment was received in Indian rupees. The Tribunal allowed the exemption, interpreting "convertible foreign exchange" liberally to include Indian rupees. However, the High Court found that section 10A(3) mandates that exemption is available only on actual exports with consideration received in convertible foreign exchange, which is defined by the RBI. The court ruled that the conditions of section 10A(3) were not satisfied as the sales were interstate and payments were in Indian rupees, not convertible foreign exchange.

Issue 2: Validity of the Tribunal's decision to condone the delay in filing appeals by the assessee.
The Tribunal condoned the delay of 627 days and 509 days in filing appeals by the assessee, accepting the explanation that the assessee took time to obtain "better opinion from tax experts." The High Court expressed surprise at the Tribunal's leniency but chose to overlook this aspect and proceeded to consider the appeals on merits.

Issue 3: Interpretation of "convertible foreign exchange" and "export turnover" under section 10A(3) of the Income-tax Act.
Section 10A(3) provides for exemption on profits derived from export sale proceeds received in convertible foreign exchange. "Convertible foreign exchange" is defined as foreign exchange treated by the RBI as convertible for the purposes of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The High Court emphasized that the statutory provisions are clear and comprehensive, requiring actual exports and receipt of convertible foreign exchange for exemption. The court rejected the Tribunal's liberal interpretation that included Indian rupees received from an Indian buyer.

Issue 4: Applicability of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, to claims under section 10A of the Income-tax Act.
The assessee argued that inter-unit sales within SEZs should be considered "deemed exports" under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, and thus eligible for exemption under section 10A. The High Court disagreed, stating that the Income-tax Act is a self-contained code, and the concept of deemed export under the SEZ Act is not incorporated into section 10A. The court noted that the SEZ Act was enacted after the relevant assessment years and that the Income-tax Act specifically requires actual exports with convertible foreign exchange. The court concluded that extending exemption to inter-unit sales within SEZs would be re-writing the legislation, which is not permissible.

Conclusion:
The High Court reversed the Tribunal's orders, restoring the original orders that denied exemption on profits derived from inter-unit sales within SEZs. The court held that section 10A(3) of the Income-tax Act requires actual exports and receipt of convertible foreign exchange for exemption, and the provisions of the SEZ Act do not alter this requirement.

---