Surtax capital computation: proposed dividend is excluded as provision, while bonus-share capitalisation does not create fresh capital.

Rectification under section 13 could be challenged as a pure legal objection even if not raised earlier, and the note records that this point was accepted. For surtax capital computation, proposed dividend taken out of general reserve is treated as a provision, not a reserve, and is therefore excluded from capital. A loan from Bank of Baroda was treated as includible in capital on the basis of earlier binding litigation involving the same assessee. Bonus shares issued by capitalising general reserve do not create a net increase in capital under rule 3 unless there is a real addition to the capital base computed under rule 1.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the assessee could raise the additional ground that the rectification under section 13 was not permissible; (ii) whether proposed dividend could be deducted from general reserve while computing capital; (iii) whether the loan from Bank of Baroda qualified for inclusion in capital; (iv) whether credit for the proportionate value of bonus shares could be given without adjusting general reserve.

Issue (i): Whether the assessee could raise the additional ground that the rectification under section 13 was not permissible.

Analysis: The additional ground was a pure legal contention going to the permissibility of rectification. The question was whether the alleged mistake was of the kind capable of rectification under section 13, and such a contention could be entertained even though it had not been taken earlier. Since the substantive issue under the bonus-share topic was answered against the Revenue, the rectification point could not be rejected as unavailable.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

Issue (ii): Whether proposed dividend could be deducted from general reserve while computing capital.

Analysis: The governing distinction between 'reserve' and 'provision' under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, had already been settled by the Supreme Court. An amount earmarked for proposed dividend is not part of reserve for capital computation because an appropriation made for dividend is treated as a provision and is excluded under the Explanation to rule 1 of the Second Schedule. The proposed dividend therefore could not remain in the general reserve for purposes of capital computation.

Conclusion: The issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Issue (iii): Whether the loan from Bank of Baroda qualified for inclusion in capital.

Analysis: The same loan had already been held, in earlier litigation concerning the very assessee, to be includible in capital for surtax purposes. Applying that earlier binding reasoning to the identical loan and materially similar assessment years, the loan satisfied the requirements for inclusion in the capital base.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

Issue (iv): Whether credit for the proportionate value of bonus shares could be given without adjusting general reserve.

Analysis: Rule 3 of the Second Schedule requires an actual increase in the capital computed under rule 1 after the first day of the previous year. When bonus shares are issued by capitalising part of the general reserve, the increase in paid-up capital is exactly matched by a corresponding depletion of general reserve, so there is no net increase in capital as computed under rule 1. The rule therefore applies only where there is a fresh influx of capital, not a mere internal rearrangement between reserve and paid-up capital.

Conclusion: The issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The references were disposed of with the assessee succeeding on the rectification and loan issues, but failing on the proposed-dividend and bonus-share computation issues.

Ratio Decidendi: For surtax capital computation, dividend appropriations are excluded as provisions, while capitalisation of reserves through bonus shares does not increase capital under rule 3 unless there is a real addition to the capital base computed under rule 1.

---