Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of central excise duty and penalty on clearance of waste and scrap from a 100% export oriented unit was sustainable after the Tribunal had already held that the benefit of the relevant exemption notification was available.
Analysis: The clearance of waste and scrap had been assessed on the basis of the higher rate of duty, but the Tribunal noted that in the earlier proceedings it had already been held that the appellant was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 83/90 dated 20.03.1990. Once that entitlement was recognised, the demand raised in the impugned order became only a consequence of the earlier view on rate of duty. The foundation of the demand, therefore, could not survive.
Conclusion: The demand and penalty were not sustainable and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.