Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty notice issued during the pendency of the appeals and stay petitions was premature, and whether recovery pursuant to the notice should be stayed until the stay petitions were decided.
Analysis: The assessment orders were already under challenge in pending appeals, and the connected stay petitions were also pending consideration. In that situation, issuance of penalty proceedings under Section 221(1) of the Income-tax Act was treated as premature. The appropriate course was to have the stay petitions considered expeditiously after notice to the petitioner, and to protect the petitioner from recovery action in the meantime.
Conclusion: The penalty notice was held to be premature, and recovery proceedings pursuant to it were stayed until the stay petitions were decided.