Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on inputs used by a job worker in the manufacture of goods cleared to the principal manufacturer could be denied on the ground that separate accounts were not maintained under Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied its Larger Bench precedent and held that goods manufactured on job work basis and cleared to the principal manufacturer are not to be treated as exempted goods. On that basis, the restrictions relating to common inputs and maintenance of separate accounts under Rule 6(2) had no application. The denial of credit by the lower authority was therefore found unsustainable.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was held admissible to the job worker, and the denial based on Rule 6(2) was rejected.