Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether macraberin tablets, being a fixed dose combination of Vitamin B1, B6 and B12, were classifiable under Chapter 30 as medicaments or under Chapter 29 of the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: The classification issue for fixed dose combinations of Vitamin B1, B6 and B12 had already been settled by the Tribunal in earlier decisions, including the respondent's own case. The product was held to fall within the scope of medicaments under Chapter 30, and the revenue's contention for Chapter 29 classification was not accepted.
Conclusion: The goods are classifiable under Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff and not under Chapter 29. The revenue's appeal fails.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order setting aside the demand was sustained, and the appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: A fixed dose combination of Vitamins B1, B6 and B12, when treated consistently as a medicament by prior binding tribunal decisions, is classifiable under Chapter 30 rather than as a Chapter 29 chemical product.