Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the fixed dose combination product consisting of Vitamins B1, B6 and B12 was classifiable as a medicament under sub-heading 3003.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or as an admixture of vitamins under Chapter Heading 2936.00.
Analysis: The classification depended on the nature and therapeutic character of the product. The Tribunal relied on its earlier view that a fixed dose combination of Vitamins B1, B6 and B12 has therapeutic value, as reflected in the Drugs Controller General (India) communication dated 23-2-1996 and the Drugs Technical Advisory Board's opinion. The later validity of the notification under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 was not treated as determinative of tariff classification, since the present dispute concerned excise classification under the tariff and the earlier Tribunal decision had already held such measured-dose vitamin combinations to be medicaments.
Conclusion: The product was held classifiable as a medicament under sub-heading 3003.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and not under Chapter Heading 2936.00.