Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the customs duty demand could be sustained on the ground that Notification No. 34/97-Cus. did not cover Singanallur and whether the assessee was barred from utilising DEPB credit because TRA facility was required.
Analysis: The DEPB scrip was registered at Singanallur. In that situation, the requirement of following TRA facility under Circular No. 16/99, as amended by Circular No. 70/99, did not arise. Once the scrip stood registered at Singanallur, there was no objection to utilisation of the DEPB credit for import clearance.
Conclusion: The demand of customs duty was unsustainable and the assessee was entitled to utilise the DEPB credit.