Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the exemption under Notification No. 29/2002-C.E. as amended by Notification No. 34/2002-C.E. was available when petroleum products were removed under bond from the refinery to one warehouse and thereafter cleared from another warehouse on payment of duty at the concessional rate.
Analysis: The amended notification extended the exemption to specified petroleum products removed under bond from the notified refineries to a warehouse and subsequently cleared from the warehouse on payment of fifty per cent of the duty. The text of the amendment did not restrict the benefit to cases where the warehouse from which clearance was made had received the goods directly from the refinery. The purpose of the notification was to extend concessional duty treatment to the notified petroleum products originating from the specified refineries, and there was no basis to deny the benefit merely because the goods had passed through one or more bonded warehouses before final clearance.
Conclusion: The demand of differential duty was not sustainable, and the denial of exemption was /unsustainable on the ground that direct receipt from the refinery was absent. The assessee was entitled to the exemption and consequential relief.