Zinc dross classification dispute: Tribunal rejected mis-declaration, upheld free importability, and set aside confiscation and penalty.

Zinc dross imported under Chapter sub-heading 7902.0010 was held not to involve mis-declaration where the Chemical Examiner's report showed zinc content of 92.2% and did not give reasoned support for rejecting the declared grade. The Tribunal noted that ISRI grade names such as seal, score and gray did not affect importability or duty treatment, and that zinc dross above 92% zinc content fell within the unrestricted category. The denial of retest, together with the inconclusive report, undermined the allegations. Confiscation and penalty based on the alleged violation were therefore set aside, and the importer obtained consequential relief.

---

---

Issues: Whether zinc dross containing more than 90% zinc was classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 7902.0010 as a restricted item, and whether describing it as a particular ISRI grade amounted to misdeclaration.

Analysis: The chemical examiner's report showed zinc content of 92.2% by weight and confirmed that the sample had the characteristics of zinc dross. The decisive criterion for the entry was the nature of the goods as zinc dross, not the particular ISRI grade mentioned in the declaration. Since the grades referred to by the importer did not affect duty incidence and all such grades were freely importable, no adverse inference could be drawn merely because the sample was not accepted as the declared grade. The report also did not explain why the goods could not be treated as the declared grade or identify any other appropriate category. In these circumstances, the request for retest and the absence of a finding of incorrect classification supported the importer's case.

Conclusion: The goods were not shown to be restricted or misdeclared, and the confiscation and penalty could not be sustained.

Final Conclusion: The import was held to be correctly treatable as zinc dross, and the assessee was entitled to consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the chemical composition and essential character of imported goods satisfy the tariff description, a disputed commercial grade label alone does not justify a finding of misdeclaration or restriction in import.

---