2010 (10) TMI 742 - HC - Income Tax

Tax Court Deems Security Deposit Interest Taxable

The court found that the interest-free security deposit was a sham device to avoid tax liability and had no genuine connection to the actual rent ... Notional Interest on security - part of annual letting value of the property. - Section 23 - Held that:- Where payment of the security deposit is to circumvent the real rent, the same shall fall within its ambit as income from house property. - Decided against Assessee. Issues Involved:1. Whether the interest-free security deposit constitutes a device to circumvent income tax liability.2. Whether notional interest on the security deposit should be included in the annual value under Section 23 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Interest-Free Security Deposit as a Device to Circumvent Income Tax LiabilityThe core issue is whether the security deposit with an interest-free stipulation is a device to circumvent liability of income tax. The court noted that the assessee received Rs. 35 lakhs as an interest-free security deposit from tenants but showed a low rental income of Rs. 1.50 lakhs annually. The Assessing Officer (AO) concluded that this security deposit was a device to divert income and avoid tax, determining the annual value at Rs. 7.80 lakhs by adding notional interest.The lease agreements stipulated a disproportionate security deposit compared to the actual rent, with no provision for annual rent increase. The court found that the security deposit was 140 times the monthly rent and had no rationale with the agreed rent, indicating an attempt to avoid tax. The court referenced the Supreme Court's observations in McDowell and Co. Ltd. v. CTO [1985] 154 ITR 148, emphasizing that tax avoidance devices should not receive judicial approval.Conclusion: The security deposit was a sham device to avoid tax and had no real basis with the actual rent received by the assessee.Issue 2: Notional Interest on Security Deposit under Section 23 of the Income-tax ActSection 23 of the Income-tax Act deals with the determination of the annual value of property for computing income from house property. The court examined whether notional interest on the security deposit should be included in the annual value. The original Section 23(1) was amended by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, which made the annual value the higher of the expected rent or the actual rent received/receivable.The court acknowledged that ordinarily, notional interest on a security deposit would not form part of the income from house property, as held by the Bombay High Court in CIT v. J. K. Investors (Bombay) Ltd. [2001] 248 ITR 723. However, when the security deposit is used to circumvent the real rent, it should be included as income from house property.Conclusion: The notional interest on the security deposit should be included in the annual value under Section 23, as the security deposit was a device to circumvent the real rent.Final Judgment:The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal erred in deciding against the Revenue. The court held that interest on the security deposit of Rs. 35 lakhs would be treated as income of the assessee. To meet the ends of justice, the court determined that interest at the rate of 9% per annum on the security amount would be considered taxable income under the head 'Income from house property' relating to the land and building. The appeals were allowed, and the substantial questions of law were answered accordingly.