Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit of the disputed duty, interest and penalty was justified on a prima facie view that service tax paid on GTA services used for providing erection, commissioning and installation services constituted eligible input service credit.
Analysis: The applicant was engaged in erection, commissioning and installation of transmission lines and had transported goods to different sites, paying service tax on GTA services. On the materials before it, the Tribunal found a prima facie entitlement to credit as the applicant was a provider of taxable output services. The Tribunal also took note of the Board circular clarifying the tax treatment of such activity and the treatment of pending disputes.
Conclusion: The Tribunal held that the pre-deposit already made was sufficient, waived the balance amount of duty, interest and penalty, and stayed recovery during the pendency of the appeal.