TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds duty exemption for photopolymer plates as 'printing blocks'</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MUMBAI-IV Versus NUMEX BLOCKS</h3> COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MUMBAI-IV Versus NUMEX BLOCKS - 2011 (268) E.L.T. 238 (Tri. - Mumbai) Issues:Classification of 'Flexographic plates' as 'blocks for printing purpose' under Heading No. 8442.10 for nil duty rate or under Heading No. 8442.90 for chargeable duty.Analysis:The appeal involved a dispute over the classification of 'Flexographic plates' manufactured by the assessee as either 'blocks for printing purpose' under Heading No. 8442.10 attracting nil duty rate or under Heading No. 8442.90 chargeable to duty. The Commissioner initially concluded that the plates were 'printing blocks' under Heading No. 8442.10, dropping further proceedings. The Tribunal partially allowed the department's appeal on limitation and remanded the case for fresh classification based on expert opinions. The Government Institute of Printing Technology, Mumbai, opined that the plates are distinct from 'printing blocks' and should be classified under Heading No. 8442.90. However, expert opinions from other institutions supported the classification as 'printing blocks'. The Commissioner observed that commercial invoices described the products as printing blocks, leading to the conclusion that they fall under Heading No. 8442.10.The Revenue contended that the product should be classified as a printing plate, ineligible for duty exemption/concession. The respondent argued that the product met the criteria for 'printing blocks' exempted from duty under relevant notifications. The manufacturing process involved steps such as image transfer and etching to create relief images suitable for printing. The respondent highlighted duty exemptions applicable to 'printing blocks and printing types' under various notifications and the tariff.Expert opinions from different institutions and the Government Institute of Printing Technology supported the classification of the relief image plates as 'printing blocks'. The commercial description of the product as printing blocks, along with the historical context of duty exemptions for such products, reinforced the classification. The Tribunal emphasized that a liberal interpretation was warranted, following the principle of wider interpretation for products falling within exemption scopes. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the original order, rejecting the department's appeal and affirming the duty exemption eligibility for the 'printing blocks' manufactured by the assessee.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the classification of the photopolymer relief image plates as 'printing blocks' eligible for duty exemption during the relevant period. The decision was based on expert opinions, commercial descriptions, historical duty exemptions, and the nature of the product suitable for printing purposes.
TaxTMI 