Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under section 27(1) of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 was leviable where the assessee failed to disclose flight-kitchen sales to foreign airlines in the returns filed for the relevant assessment years.
Analysis: The liability to pay interest under section 27(1) read with section 21(3) arises when the dealer fails to pay the full amount of tax due according to a return that is correct and complete. The Court held that the question is not merely whether there is a difference between the assessed turnover and the returned turnover, but whether the return filed was truthful, complete, and bona fide on the facts of the case. The assessee knew of the advance ruling treating similar supplies as local sales, had itself been paying local sales tax on such transactions in earlier years, and created a delivery order to support the export-characterisation. In these circumstances, the omission of the disputed turnover rendered the return incomplete and incorrect. The Court distinguished authorities relied upon by the assessee, holding that a debatable issue did not arise on these facts.
Conclusion: Interest was leviable under section 27(1) of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975, and the answer to the reference was in the affirmative and against the assessee.