Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service tax was leviable on services received from foreign-based service providers for the period prior to insertion of section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The disputed period was 01.01.2005 to 16.06.2005. The demand related to services received from foreign-based service providers having no office in India. In light of the Board circular and the legal position that the recipient was not liable to pay service tax on such services before insertion of section 66A, the basis for the demand did not survive.
Conclusion: Service tax was not payable by the recipient for the period prior to insertion of section 66A, and the demand was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, and the stay petition was disposed of.
Ratio Decidendi: Service tax on services received from foreign-based service providers was not leviable from the recipient for periods prior to insertion of section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994.