Appellate Tribunal Upholds Confiscation of Pharmaceuticals due to Unauthorized Manufacturing

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, AHEMDABAD upheld the sustained confiscation of pharmaceutical products valued at Rs.11,40,959/- due to unauthorized manufacturing and non-accounting of goods by M/s Lacure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., a 100% EOU. Penalties and duty demands were imposed under Central Excise and Customs Acts. Despite fulfilling export obligations, discrepancies in the manufacturing process and lack of proper documentation led to penalties. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maintaining proper accounts and fulfilling obligations, recommending reductions in fines and penalties while remanding the case for further determination on duty payment. Fines and penalties on the appellant and the director were reduced under Central Excise Rules and Customs Act.

---

---

Issues: Confiscation of goods, imposition of penalties, duty liability on raw materials, maintenance of proper accounts, export obligations fulfillment

In the judgment delivered by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, AHEMDABAD, the case involved the confiscation of pharmaceutical products manufactured by an appellant, a 100% EOU, valued at Rs.16,59,228/- due to alleged unauthorized manufacturing and non-accounting of goods. The appellant, M/s Lacure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., faced penalties and duty demands on finished products under Central Excise and Customs Acts. The appellant claimed that the goods were manufactured for and on behalf of another entity, M/s Intermed, and fulfilled export obligations as per EXIM policy. The Tribunal considered submissions regarding the manufacturing process, permissions, and fulfillment of export obligations. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the manufacturing process and lack of proper documentation, leading to the sustained confiscation of goods valued at Rs.11,40,959/- and penalties. The appellant's failure to maintain proper accounts and non-entry of goods in daily stock accounts were highlighted, leading to the sustained confiscation of unaccounted goods valued at Rs.5,18,269/-. Despite the ultimate export of all goods, the appellant's lack of valid reasons for non-accounting warranted a nominal redemption fine. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed examination regarding duty liability on exported goods and penalties reduction based on the lenient view taken on confiscation. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further determination on duty payment, with reductions in fines and penalties imposed on the appellant and the director. The judgment concluded with the reduction of fines and penalties on M/s Lacure Pharmaceuticals and the director under Central Excise Rules and Customs Act, respectively.

In conclusion, the judgment addressed issues related to the confiscation of goods, imposition of penalties, duty liability on raw materials, maintenance of proper accounts, and the fulfillment of export obligations by a 100% EOU. The Tribunal scrutinized the manufacturing processes, permissions, and documentation to determine violations leading to confiscation and penalties. The importance of maintaining proper accounts and fulfilling mandatory requirements was emphasized, even though all goods were eventually exported. The Tribunal highlighted the need for a detailed examination of duty liability on exported goods and recommended reductions in fines and penalties based on a lenient view taken on confiscation. The remand to the adjudicating authority aimed to provide a fair opportunity for the appellant to address duty payment issues, with adjustments in fines and penalties to reflect the Tribunal's considerations.

---