Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cancellation of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was justified on the facts, and whether any referable question of law arose under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee had itself brought the totalling mistakes in the books of account to the notice of the authorities and had filed revised returns immediately thereafter. The authorities had not independently discovered the mistakes before the disclosure. On these facts, the addition to income was attributable to bona fide accounting errors rather than concealment of particulars of income. The Tribunal's view that the penalty was not warranted was supported by the record, and the order did not give rise to a referable question of law.
Conclusion: The deletion of penalty was upheld and the Revenue's request for reference was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee voluntarily discloses bona fide accounting mistakes and files revised returns before detection by the department, concealment penalty is not attracted and no referable question of law arises from the Tribunal's deletion of penalty.