Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the denial of exemption under Notification No.33/04-ST for transportation of milk and under Notification No.6/05-ST for commission on distribution of milk called for reconsideration, and whether the matter should be remanded to the original adjudicating authority.
Analysis: The contract and the surrounding record indicated separate charges for transportation and distribution activities. The appellant also pointed out that other similarly situated distributors of the same principal had been granted the benefit of the notifications. In view of the comparable adjudication orders already passed in favour of other distributors, the dispute required fresh examination at the original level.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for reconsideration.