Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight or transportation charges collected through debit notes were includible in the assessable value when the goods were cleared from the factory gate and the actual transportation cost alone was recovered from buyers.
Analysis: The factual finding recorded in appeal was that the respondent had collected only the actual transportation charges from customers through debit notes. In the absence of any contrary evidence from the Revenue, that finding remained unshaken. The valuation was held to be governed by Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000, under which the freight element could be excluded where the charges represented actual transportation cost. The place of removal was treated as the factory gate, and the Board circulars relied upon supported determination of the point of sale and abatement of actual cost charged from buyers.
Conclusion: Freight charges actually recovered through debit notes were not liable to be included in the assessable value. The Revenue appeal was rejected and the order in favour of the assessee was upheld.