Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, while sustaining penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, the appellants were entitled to pay 25% of the penalty amount.
Analysis: The penalty under Section 78 was upheld, but it was found that the authorities below had not granted the appellants the benefit of paying 25% of the penalty in terms of the cited High Court decision. The appellants were therefore permitted to discharge only 25% of the penalty within the stipulated time, failing which the full penalty would become payable.
Conclusion: The appellants were held entitled to the option of paying 25% of the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, while the penalty itself was sustained.