Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition relating to the alleged dummy concern could be made in the regular assessment proceedings or was confined to block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The search did not itself yield the income as undisclosed income in the sense of a completed regular return being ignored; rather, during the block assessment proceedings the Assessing Officer found that the concern shown in the name of another person was ically controlled by the assessee. The entries stood in the regular books of account and the other person had been assessing the income as proprietor, so the issue was whether the Assessing Officer could lift the veil and assess the real beneficiary in regular assessment while protecting the revenue by reopening the case of the named proprietor under Section 148. On this view, the Tribunal was wrong in treating the matter as one that could arise only in block assessment.
Conclusion: The addition could be made in the regular assessment proceedings against the assessee, and the reopening/protective assessment in the name of the apparent proprietor was also justified.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the question is only to identify the owner or controller of an apparently regular concern, the Assessing Officer may lift the veil in regular assessment, while block assessment remains confined to undisclosed income unearthed in search.