Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (8) TMI 41 - SC - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Including Royalties in Transaction Value for Imported Music Cassettes The Supreme Court held that royalties paid are to be included in the transaction value of imported pre-recorded music cassettes as conditions of sale. ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Including Royalties in Transaction Value for Imported Music Cassettes

                          The Supreme Court held that royalties paid are to be included in the transaction value of imported pre-recorded music cassettes as conditions of sale. Orders in several appeals were set aside, restoring the Department's order. The judgment emphasized the necessity of including royalties in the transaction value when they are conditions of sale, in line with the Customs Act and Valuation Rules.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Valuation of imported audio compact discs (CDs) for customs duty purposes.
                          2. Inclusion of royalty payments in the transaction value of imported goods.
                          3. Relationship between importer and supplier affecting the transaction value.
                          4. Applicability of Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 and relevant case laws.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Valuation of Imported Audio Compact Discs (CDs):
                          The primary issue revolves around the correct valuation of imported audio CDs for customs duty purposes. The Respondent-company imported CDs from Singapore and Australia, declaring values of USD 0.6 and 1.62 Australian Dollar per CD, respectively. The Assistant Commissioner assessed the CDs' value, allowing deductions except for advertisement and publicity expenses, fixing the assessable value at Rs.100 per CD for Singapore imports and Rs.199 per CD for Australian imports. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this valuation, but the CEGAT set aside the Commissioner's order, favoring the Respondent.

                          2. Inclusion of Royalty Payments in the Transaction Value:
                          A significant contention was whether royalty payments should be included in the transaction value of imported goods. In Civil Appeal No. 2959 of 2008, the Deputy Commissioner of Customs included royalty payments in the transaction value, considering it a condition of sale. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) and CESTAT rejected this inclusion, stating that the royalty was not a condition of sale. Similar issues were raised in Civil Appeal No. 4751 of 2006, Civil Appeal No. 2832 of 2006, and Civil Appeal No. 1 of 2009, where the inclusion of royalty in the transaction value was debated.

                          3. Relationship Between Importer and Supplier Affecting the Transaction Value:
                          In several appeals, the relationship between the importer and supplier was scrutinized under Rule 2(2) of Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. For instance, in Civil Appeal No. 2959 of 2008, the Deputy Commissioner held that the Respondent and the supplier were related, affecting the transaction value. This relationship was also examined in Civil Appeal No. 4751 of 2006, where the Deputy Commissioner initially found no impact on prices due to the relationship, but the Commissioner (Appeals) disagreed, leading to further appeals.

                          4. Applicability of Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 and Relevant Case Laws:
                          The judgment extensively discussed the applicability of Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. The Supreme Court referred to Rule 9(1)(c), which mandates the inclusion of royalties and license fees in the transaction value if they are conditions of sale. The Court also cited precedents like Commissioner of Customs Vs. Ferodo India Pvt. Ltd. and Associated Cement Companies Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs to emphasize that royalties related to the imported goods must be included in the transaction value if they constitute a condition of sale.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Supreme Court concluded that the value of royalties paid is to be included in the transaction value of imported pre-recorded music cassettes, as these payments were conditions of sale. The Court set aside the Tribunal's orders in Civil Appeal Nos. 8627-8628 of 2002, Civil Appeal No. 2959 of 2008, Civil Appeal No. 4751 of 2006, and Civil Appeal No. 2832 of 2006, restoring the Department's order. However, Civil Appeal No. 1 of 2009 was dismissed. The judgment underscores the importance of including royalties in the transaction value when they are conditions of sale, aligning with the Customs Act and Valuation Rules.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found