Taxability of seismic data revenues in India under section 44BB confirmed by Authority

The case involved WesternGeco International Ltd. (WGIL) concerning the taxability of revenues under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for seismic data acquisition in India. The Authority held that the services provided were not technical and fell under section 44BB. The entire mobilization/demobilization revenues related to seismic data acquisition were deemed taxable in India at an effective rate of 4.223%. The ruling was in favor of the Revenue, affirming the taxability of the revenues under section 44BB.

---

---

Issues:
1. Taxability of revenues earned under seismic data acquisition and processing contract with BHP Billiton in India under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Taxability of revenues arising from mobilization/demobilization activities attributable to vessel's journey outside India.

Issue 1:
The case involved WesternGeco International Ltd. (WGIL), a British Virgin Islands company engaged in seismic data acquisition for oil and gas exploration in India. The applicant sought clarification on the taxability of revenues under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The applicant argued that only the income attributable to operations carried out in India should be taxed under section 44BB, relying on the explanation to section 9(1)(i) of the Act. The applicant also contended that if taxable under section 44BB, the income should not be taxed as fees for technical services under section 115A and section 44DA of the Act. Reference was made to previous rulings by the Authority to support the position that data acquisition and processing services fall under section 44BB. The Revenue argued that the entire mobilization/demobilization revenues should be included in gross receipts for taxation purposes. The Authority held that the applicant's services were not technical in nature, thus falling under section 44BB. Question 1 was answered in the affirmative.

Issue 2:
Regarding the taxability of revenues from mobilization/demobilization activities, the applicant argued that only the portion attributable to the vessel's journey outside India should be excluded from income computation under section 44BB. The Revenue contended that these receipts were in the nature of fees for technical services. The Authority clarified that once an assessee opts for section 44BB(1), the profits are deemed as a percentage of specified amounts paid on account of services in India. There is no provision to split the amount payable to the assessee. The applicant must exercise the option under section 44BB(3) to compute income differently. The Authority held that the entire mobilization/demobilization revenues related to seismic data acquisition and processing would be taxable in India at an effective rate of 4.223%. Question 2 was answered accordingly. The ruling was pronounced on July 25, 2011, by Mr. V. K. Shridhar.

---