Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the requirement of pre-deposit of duty demand was to be waived where the impugned dies block were used for manufacture of both exempted goods and dutiable goods.
Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. was not in dispute. The dispute was confined to reversal of credit taken on dies block. The appellants produced invoices and also relied on the pleading that the impugned dies were used partly for exempted goods and partly for dutiable goods cleared to Defence Establishment. On that basis, the credit taken on inputs used in the manufacture of capital goods could not be denied at the interim stage if the capital goods were used for both exempted and dutiable final products.
Conclusion: The appellants made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, and the requirement of pre-deposit was waived.