Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty was payable on transfer of HSD oil by a 100% EOU to another unit during the period after the amendment to Notification No. 1/95-CE, and whether the earlier permission continued to protect such clearances.
Analysis: The amendment introduced by Notification No. 35/02 with effect from 24.06.02 barred inter-unit transfer of raw materials, consumables and fuels, whether the recipient unit was within or outside the zone. Since the transfers in question were made during 24.06.02 to 03.07.02, the amended notification governed the clearances. The subsequent communication withdrawing permission in 2003 did not alter the legal position created by the amendment already in force.
Conclusion: The duty demand was correctly upheld and the appeal was liable to be rejected.