Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the suppliers manufacturing washing machine parts according to the assessee's design and specifications could be treated as job workers, and whether Rule 57S(8) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 permitted removal of moulds and dyes without payment of duty to such job workers.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that the suppliers were undertaking manufacture on job-work basis because the parts were produced as per the assessee's purchase orders, design and specifications. It further held that the fact that the suppliers used their own raw materials did not take them out of the category of job workers. Rule 57S(8), being a non obstante provision, empowered removal of moulds and dyes without payment of duty to the premises of the job worker for production of goods on behalf of the manufacturer and according to the manufacturer's specifications.
Conclusion: The challenge by the Revenue failed and the order granting relief to the assessee was upheld.