Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether moulds could be cleared without reversing Modvat credit when the parts were manufactured by suppliers using their own raw-materials, but according to the appellant's designs and specifications, so as to fall within Rule 57S(8) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The arrangement showed that manufacture of the washing machine parts had been assigned to the suppliers on job work basis. The use of their own raw-materials did not take the suppliers outside the category of job workers for the purpose of Rule 57S(8). That provision, beginning with a non obstante clause, specifically permitted removal of moulds and dyes without payment of duty to a job worker for production of goods on behalf of the manufacturer and according to his specifications. The earlier decisions relied upon supported the view that supply of raw-materials by the manufacturer was not a necessary condition for treating the recipient as a job worker under this rule.
Conclusion: The clearance of moulds without reversing the Modvat credit was permissible and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of Rule 57S(8) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, a person manufacturing goods to the manufacturer's designs and specifications is a job worker even if he uses his own raw-materials, and moulds may be removed to such job worker without reversal of credit.