Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the corrigendum to Notification No. 56/2002-CE, which corrected the khasra number in the annexure, had to be read from the date of the original notification so as to extend the exemption benefit to the assessee's factory situated at Khasra No. 422.
Analysis: The corrigendum dated 15 September 2010 clarified that the reference in the annexure to Khasra No. 5 was to be read as Khasra No. 422. Since the corrigendum was issued in continuation of the original notification, the correction was treated as relating back to the date of the original notification. On that basis, the factory situated at Khasra No. 422 was held to be covered by the exemption notification. The earlier decisions relied upon supported the same approach.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of the notification and the denial of refund on the ground that Khasra No. 422 was not mentioned could not be sustained.