Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of service tax on electricity wheeling or distribution under Business Auxiliary Service was liable to be set aside in view of Notification No. 45/2010-ST dated 20/7/2010.
Analysis: The demand was confirmed for electricity wheeling or distribution under the category of Business Auxiliary Service. The dispute was already covered by an earlier identical decision of the same Bench, and the relevant period fell within the scope of the notification issued by the Government of India. In view of that notification and the covered period, the impugned demand could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The demand was not sustainable and was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded and the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the relevant period is covered by a notification granting protection or relief, a service tax demand on the same activity cannot be sustained.