High Court upholds 100% depreciation for fire glass melting furnaces acquired in earlier years

The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's decision to allow 100% depreciation on fire glass melting furnaces acquired in earlier years. The Court emphasized that the eligibility for depreciation is not restricted based on the year of acquisition of the asset, referencing a previous decision involving old salt pans to support this view. The assessee was deemed entitled to claim 100% depreciation on the written down value of the furnaces, calculated based on the actual cost less depreciation. The Court's decision favored the assessee over the Revenue, and the reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.

---

---

Issues:
Interpretation of depreciation rules for fire glass melting furnaces acquired before and after January 1, 1970.

Analysis:
The case involved a question referred to the High Court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the eligibility of the assessee for 100% depreciation on fire glass melting furnaces acquired in earlier years. The Tribunal had allowed the depreciation, which was contested by the Revenue. The Revenue argued that prior to January 1, 1970, expenditure on replacement of such furnaces was treated as revenue expenditure, and depreciation was not allowable. However, the Tribunal held that 100% depreciation was admissible even for assets acquired in earlier years, contrary to the Revenue's contention.

The High Court analyzed the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, particularly Section 32, which provides for depreciation on assets used for business purposes. It was noted that until January 1, 1970, the rules did not prescribe any percentage for depreciation on direct fire glass melting furnaces. Subsequently, an amendment allowed for 100% depreciation on such furnaces. The Court emphasized that the definition of "written down value" in Section 43(6) does not restrict depreciation eligibility based on the year of acquisition of the asset.

The Court referred to a previous decision involving old salt pans to support the view that depreciation at 100% could be admissible regardless of the age of the asset, as long as other conditions were met. Therefore, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, ruling in favor of the assessee's entitlement to 100% depreciation on the written down value of the furnaces, calculated based on the actual cost less depreciation. The question referred to the Court was answered in the affirmative, against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee. The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.

---