Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was liable to be set aside in view of the appellants' application for registration soon after levy of service tax, payment of tax and interest after detection, and the case for a lenient view under section 80.
Analysis: The appellants were engaged in re-treading of old tyres, a service brought within the service tax net from 16.06.2005. They applied for registration shortly thereafter and the application was acknowledged by the department. The tax and interest were paid after detection by the Central Excise Intelligence Directorate. In these circumstances, a lenient view was considered appropriate for the purpose of penalty.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 78 was set aside, while the tax and interest determined by the authorities below were confirmed.