Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of differential duty and penalty could be sustained when the abatement figures recorded in the show-cause notice and accepted in the adjudication order kept the assessee within the SSI exemption ceiling limit.
Analysis: The figures in the show-cause notice and in the orders below showed abatement of Rs. 500 per PMT towards freight and Rs. 100 per PMT towards handling charges for cement sold within Pondicherry. On that basis, the assessee remained within the ceiling prescribed by the SSI exemption notification applicable at the relevant time. The Revenue could not, at the appellate stage, seek to reinterpret those figures as Rs. 500 per load and Rs. 100 per load when the notice and the adjudication proceeded on the basis of per PMT abatement. Since the assessee fell within the exemption limit on the figures actually adopted below, the demand had no sustainable basis.
Conclusion: The demand was rightly set aside and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed and the assessee's entitlement to the SSI exemption, as assessed on the figures recorded in the proceedings, was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: The Revenue cannot later reinterpret the very abatement figures adopted in the show-cause notice and adjudication to take the assessee outside the SSI exemption ceiling when those figures, on their face, keep the assessee within the prescribed limit.