Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether lease rentals received by the assessee from the property developed on lease were assessable as income from business or as income from house property.
Analysis: Section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 brings to tax the annual value of property of which the assessee is the owner under the head income from house property. The scope of ownership for this purpose is enlarged by section 27, including deemed ownership in specified cases, and section 269UA(f) treats long-term lease transactions as transfers for the purposes of sections 22 to 26. On the facts, the assessee had obtained the property on lease, developed it, and derived rental income by letting it out. The lease arrangement conferred rights sufficient to treat the assessee as owner for the purposes of section 22. The earlier decision relied upon by the assessee did not assist, because the later statutory expansion of deemed ownership applied, and the principle in Poddar Cement and the reasoning in Chennai Properties supported assessment under the head house property.
Conclusion: The rental income was assessable as income from house property and not as income from business, and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purposes of section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, ownership includes deemed or beneficial ownership arising from statutorily recognized leasehold rights, so rental income from such property is taxable under the head income from house property.