Annual letting value can be fixed on objective valuation factors when a related-party rent appears nominal and unrealistic.

A property let to a related party at a nominal rent may be treated as yielding a realistic expected return rather than the stated rent, where surrounding facts show the rent is far below market indicators. In assessing annual letting value under section 23(1), authorities may rely on objective valuation factors such as location, size, land and building prices, scarcity of comparable accommodation, and an approved valuer's report. A finding that the agreed rent is not standard rent will stand where it is supported by relevant material and is not perverse. On these facts, the annual letting value of Rs. 18,000 was upheld and the challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the rent of Rs. 500 per month was nominal and whether the property fell within the rent control provisions relied upon; (ii) whether the annual letting value under section 23(1) was rightly fixed at Rs. 18,000; (iii) whether the finding that the agreed rent was not standard rent and was supported by material on record was justified.

Issue (i): Whether the rent of Rs. 500 per month was nominal and whether the property fell within the rent control provisions relied upon.

Analysis: The property was a substantial bungalow in a prime area, gifted at a stated value of Rs. 2,15,000 and let out immediately thereafter to a close relative at Rs. 500 per month without any lease deed. The rent was found to be far below the expected return from the property, and the authorities treated it as nominal in light of the property's value and relevant surrounding circumstances.

Conclusion: The finding that the agreed rent was nominal was upheld.

Issue (ii): Whether the annual letting value under section 23(1) was rightly fixed at Rs. 18,000.

Analysis: In determining annual value, the authorities considered the location, size, plot area, rise in land and building prices, non-availability of similar accommodation, and the approved valuer's report. On those factors, the figure of Rs. 18,000 represented a reasonable annual return and could not be regarded as excessive or unreasonable.

Conclusion: The annual letting value of Rs. 18,000 was correctly fixed.

Issue (iii): Whether the finding that the agreed rent was not standard rent and was supported by material on record was justified.

Analysis: The Tribunal's conclusion rested on objective valuation material and the relationship between the parties, together with the mismatch between the stated rent and the property's value. The finding was based on relevant evidence and was not shown to be perverse or unsupported.

Conclusion: The finding was upheld as being supported by material on record.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue, and the assessee's challenge to the annual value determination failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a property is let at an apparently nominal rent to a related party, the annual letting value under the income-tax law may be determined on the basis of objective valuation factors and reasonable expected return, and such a factual valuation finding will not be disturbed unless shown to be perverse or unsupported by evidence.

---