Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1994 (3) TMI 83 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court ruling: Revenue wins on interest as revenue receipt, cash system followed; Assessee allowed deduction for interest paid. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue on the first three issues, stating that the interest amount is a revenue receipt, the assessee followed the cash ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court ruling: Revenue wins on interest as revenue receipt, cash system followed; Assessee allowed deduction for interest paid.

                          The court ruled in favor of the Revenue on the first three issues, stating that the interest amount is a revenue receipt, the assessee followed the cash system of accounting post-business termination, and deductions for interest paid to the Federal Bank are allowable only for the relevant assessment year. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee on the fourth issue, allowing the deduction for interest paid to the Federal Bank during the relevant assessment year.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Classification of interest amount as revenue receipt.
                          2. Accounting system followed by the assessee post-business termination.
                          3. Deduction of interest paid to the Federal Bank during previous assessment years.
                          4. Deduction of interest paid to the Federal Bank during the relevant assessment year.

                          Summary:

                          Issue 1: Classification of Interest Amount as Revenue Receipt
                          The Tribunal held that the interest amount of Rs. 36,066.70 payable to the assessee as per the arbitrator's award is a revenue receipt. This decision was based on the precedent set in Rockwell Engineering Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1989] 180 ITR 277, where interest awarded due to delayed payments was considered an accretion to the amounts due under the contract and thus a revenue receipt. The court affirmed this view, stating that the interest is attributable and incidental to the business carried on by the assessee. Therefore, the interest amount is taxable for the assessment year 1979-80. Question No. 1 was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue.

                          Issue 2: Accounting System Followed by the Assessee Post-Business Termination
                          The Tribunal, along with the Income-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, concluded that the assessee was following the cash system of accounting after the termination of its business in 1974. This finding was based on the records and was not contested with any contrary material. Consequently, the interest amount received during the accounting period relevant to the assessment year 1979-80 is assessable in that year. Question No. 2 was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue.

                          Issue 3: Deduction of Interest Paid to the Federal Bank During Previous Assessment Years
                          The assessee claimed that interest paid to the Federal Bank during previous accounting periods should be deducted from the amounts received under the arbitration award. The Tribunal disallowed this deduction based on its finding that the assessee was following the cash system of accounting after the termination of the business. The court agreed with this view, stating that only the interest paid during the accounting period relevant to the assessment year can be deducted. Question No. 3 was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue.

                          Issue 4: Deduction of Interest Paid to the Federal Bank During the Relevant Assessment Year
                          The Department contended that no deduction should be allowed for the interest paid to the Federal Bank during the assessment year. However, the court held that u/s 176(3A), the sum received after the discontinuance of the business should be deemed as income and charged to tax accordingly. The interest paid to the bank during the accounting year in which the interest on delayed payment was received must be deducted from the amount received. Therefore, the assessee is entitled to claim this deduction. Question No. 4 was answered in the affirmative, against the Department and in favor of the assessee.

                          Conclusion:
                          The court upheld the Tribunal's decisions on all four issues, affirming that the interest amount is a revenue receipt, the assessee followed the cash system of accounting post-business termination, and deductions for interest paid to the Federal Bank are allowable only for the relevant assessment year.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found