Refund limitation under export rebate notification had to be reconsidered in light of later amendment and circular

A refund claim under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. was initially rejected as time-barred, but the later amendment by Notification No. 32/2008-S.T. extended the filing period from sixty days to six months. The Board's Circular No. 112/6/2009-S.T. further clarified that refund claims for exports made during March to June 2008 could be filed up to 31 December 2008. As the claim was filed before that date and the relevant exports fell within that period, the prior authority had not considered the circular. The limitation rejection was therefore not sustainable without reconsideration, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after hearing the appellants.

---

---

Issues: Whether the refund claim under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. was barred by limitation or required reconsideration in light of the subsequent amendment and Board circular.

Analysis: The refund was rejected as time-barred under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. The Notification was subsequently amended by Notification No. 32/2008-S.T., extending the filing period from sixty days to six months. The Board's Circular No. 112/6/2009-S.T. clarified that refund claims relating to exports made in the quarter March to June, 2008 could be filed up to 31 December 2008. Since the claim in question was filed before that date and the relevant period fell within March to June, 2008, the earlier authority had not considered the circular.

Conclusion: The rejection on limitation could not be sustained without reconsideration, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after hearing the appellants.

---