1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Bangalore stresses notice of hearing in cases, directs confirmation by Registry,</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore emphasized the importance of serving parties with a notice of hearing before listing a matter. The court directed ... Appeal β service notice of hearing - records nowhere disclose the respondents having been served with a notice - duty of the Court Master to ensure that the file contains necessary recording by the Registry that the notice of the hearing has been served upon the parties - Assistant Registrar should ensure, henceforth, that such recording is made in each and every file before the file being placed before the Bench for hearing the matter - responsibility of the Court Master to verify the same β direction to issue notice for hearing The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore emphasized the importance of ensuring that parties are served with a notice of the hearing before a matter is listed. The court directed the Assistant Registrar and Court Master to make a recording in each file to confirm notice has been served. The respondents in the case were issued a notice for a hearing on 16-11-2010.