Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed credit under Notification No. 35/2003-Central Excise (N.T.) was admissible on grey fabrics declared as inputs lying in stock, and whether such credit could be denied or reversed merely because a portion of the inputs was cleared as such.
Analysis: The notification, issued under sub-rule (3) of rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, provides deemed credit for inputs lying in stock or in process and for inputs contained in finished goods lying in stock. The decisive enquiry was the character of the goods at the time credit was availed. The appellant was a manufacturer engaged in processing fabrics, and the grey fabrics declared in stock were treated as inputs for the finished product. The notification did not provide for subsequent denial or reversal of credit merely because some inputs were later cleared as such. Denial of credit on the basis of a later event had no legal support.
Conclusion: Deemed credit was held to be admissible, and the demand for reversal and penalty was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The order of the lower authorities was set aside and relief was granted to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where credit is validly taken on inputs lying in stock under a deemed-credit notification, it cannot be denied retrospectively merely because some of those inputs are later cleared as such, unless the notification itself authorises such reversal.