Reassessment reopening fails where full primary facts were disclosed and reasons lacked a live link to escaped income

Reassessment was invalid where the assessee had disclosed all primary facts relating to shareholding, liquidation, receipt of shares and the bonus issue, because the duty of disclosure extends only to primary facts and not to legal inferences. The recorded reasons rested on a presumption that share premium necessarily represented accumulated profits, but they did not identify concrete material or a rational nexus supporting a belief of escaped income as deemed dividend. In the absence of any material omission by the assessee and without a live link between the reasons and the belief of escapement, the statutory conditions for reopening were not met, and the notice under section 148 was unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the reassessment notice could be sustained when the assessee had disclosed all primary facts and whether the recorded reasons furnished a lawful basis for the belief that income had escaped assessment as deemed dividend.

Analysis: The assessee had disclosed the original shareholding, the liquidation of the defunct company, the receipt of the shares, and the later bonus issue in the balance-sheet and assessment materials. The obligation of the assessee extended only to disclosure of primary facts; it did not include drawing legal inferences for the Assessing Officer. The recorded reasons proceeded on a presumption that the share premium necessarily represented accumulated profits, but they did not disclose concrete material showing such accumulated profits or a rational nexus between the facts and the belief that the bonus shares were assessable as dividend. In the absence of any material omission by the assessee and in the absence of a live link between the reasons and the belief of escapement, the statutory conditions for reopening were not satisfied.

Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings under section 147(a) were without jurisdiction and the notice under section 148 could not be sustained, in favour of the assessee.

---