Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reassessment order under section 39 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 could be sustained when no notice of reassessment and no opportunity to show cause were given to the dealer.
Analysis: Section 39 expressly requires the prescribed authority to issue a notice of reassessment to the dealer and to afford an opportunity of showing cause in writing before reassessing the tax liability. The reassessment order itself showed only a notice for production of books of account, but no notice under section 39 was issued before passing the reassessment order. The mandatory precondition for reassessment was therefore not complied with, and the procedure adopted violated the principles of natural justice and fair procedure.
Conclusion: The reassessment order could not be sustained and was set aside. The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for fresh reassessment in accordance with law.